Until some baseline global consensus is reached, companies will have to self-police, he says. However, Haber acknowledges that it's progress, rather than action – and there's plenty of crosstalk and duplication (and occasionally contradiction) depending on the jurisdiction. However, both Mitchell, Raji and Mike Katell, an ethics fellow at the Alan Turing Institute, highlighted the issue that voices within the Global North and economically more developed countries were given more prominence at the table this week, rather than from elsewhere in the world. Mitchell says that much of the jostling to dictate global AI rules is down to "alpha manoeuvres" that are a function of who is in power in different countries worldwide. "That kind of competition to each be the leader falls out, I think, from the tendencies of humankind and the kinds of personalities that are promoted and empowered." "Governments will seek to protect their national interests, and many of them will seek to establish themselves as leaders," she says. Such diversity and such competition is natural, says Margaret Mitchell, a researcher and chief ethics scientist at Hugging Face, an AI company lobbying for a more thoughtful, humanity-focused approach to AI. The employees secretly using AI at work."Even within that more coordinated discourse around AI, there was a shocking amount of diversity in the perspectives involved," she says. Raji points out that in some of the sessions she attended, even member states from within the European Union were advocating for different, competing and contradictory approaches to regulating AI that were also in opposition to the act the countries within the trading bloc agreed earlier this year. "But I think there's pretty divergent views across various countries around what exactly to do." ![]() "There was a global consensus on the thought that AI was something to reflect on and to regulate," she says. ![]() That much was clear at the UK summit itself, according to Deb Raji, a fellow at the Mozilla Foundation, who attended many of the meetings at Bletchley Park. Plenty of processes are running in parallel across the world to try and rein in AI companies from unsafely developing their tools. And around the same time in Japan, the G7 group of industrialised countries issued a joint statement on the importance of regulating AI that seemed timed to remind the world that they, too, had a stake in the debate. ![]() It was a deliberate decision, believe experts watching the developments play out, for the US to grab control. The day before the Bletchley Park summit began, the US unveiled an executive order outlining how it planned to regulate AI. "Even as nations compete vigorously, we can and must search for global solutions to global problems," she said in a speech at the UK summit. Gina Raimondo, the US commerce secretary, acknowledged the competition. But this was followed immediately after by the US unveiling its own version. The UK government announced on the first day of the summit it was launching a UK AI Safety Institute. And the speed of its development has alarmed the public and politicians who legislate for them.Ĭonsensus has been agreed on the need for regulation: 28 countries including the US, UK and China, alongside the European Union, signed the Bletchley Declaration, a world-first global agreement at the UK's AI Safety Summit, saying as much.īut what should be done, and by whom, is still up for debate. Generative AI – where artificial intelligence takes its collective knowledge and an input, often in the form of a question or conversation starter, and produces new text, images or other content – has changed the game. But the October 2022 release of ChatGPT by OpenAI, a company still less than a decade old, changed the paradigm. ( See this simple BBC guide to AI to learn more about how it works.)ĪI already dictates large parts of our lives without us knowing it, and has for years. In November, Collins Dictionary named the term as its " word of the year" as it had been the talking point of 2023. The term "artificial intelligence" has been around since 1956, with the concept of machine learning existing for centuries before that – albeit often more in theory than in practice. And it was held at Bletchley Park, where more than 80 years ago, a group of British scientists broke the German Enigma code. This was the world's first AI Safety Summit convened by a major international country, and was intended to help chart the future direction of the technology. As more than 100 attendees from civil society, the world's leading tech companies, and governments gathered in an English stately home, there was some tension.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |